Key Takeaways
In 2026, health systems can find significant savings across EVS, staffing, waste, laundry and linen, interpretation, food, facilities, IT, security, and administrative services. The key is to consolidate and analyze spend, benchmark pricing, identify supplier and contract gaps, prioritize opportunities, execute sourcing or renegotiation, and track realized savings while maintaining service quality.
The Top Purchased Services Categories Driving Savings in 2026
Purchased services touch nearly every part of a hospital’s operation. Environmental services, staffing, waste management, laundry and linen, food, facilities, IT, security, and administrative services all support patient care and day-to-day operations. Yet unlike many traditional supply categories, these services can be spread across facilities, departments, vendors, and contracts.
That fragmentation can make savings difficult to see.
The opportunity is not simply to spend less. It is to understand where pricing varies, where contracts are inconsistent, where suppliers overlap, and where utilization does not align with what a health system is paying for. Valify identifies more than 1,400 purchased services categories across seven lines of business, including Facility Support Services, Clinical Services, Financial Services, IT & Telecom, Ancillary Services, HR Services, and Insurance.
For healthcare leaders looking for savings opportunities in 2026, several categories deserve closer attention.
10 Purchased Services Categories Creating Savings Opportunities in 2026

1. Environmental Services (EVS)
Environmental services are a recurring expense across hospitals and health systems, making them an important category for review. Savings opportunities can come from labor models, service frequency, facility coverage, supplies, and contract pricing.
A health system with multiple facilities may also have different EVS providers or service specifications for similar needs. Comparing cost per square foot, cost per staffed bed, service levels, and contract terms can help identify meaningful differences.
The goal is not to reduce services at the expense of cleanliness or patient experience. Infection prevention, regulatory requirements, and facility needs must remain part of the evaluation.
Valify’s spend visibility and benchmarking can help healthcare leaders identify variation across facilities and vendors before deciding whether to renegotiate, source, or standardize a category.
2. Physician Staffing and Clinical Staffing Services
Physician staffing, locum tenens, and other clinical staffing arrangements can become complicated when multiple agencies and specialty providers are involved.
Health systems can examine hourly rates, agency markups, utilization, overtime, contract terms, and supplier concentration. Comparing staffing models across facilities can also reveal where similar services are being purchased under very different arrangements.
The lowest rate is not necessarily the right answer. Specialty expertise, coverage, continuity, quality, and operational requirements all matter. The objective is to understand total staffing spend and use that information to negotiate stronger agreements without compromising care.
3. Waste Management
Hospital waste management may include regulated medical waste, pharmaceutical waste, hazardous waste, recycling, and general waste. Different facilities can have different vendors, pickup schedules, container requirements, and pricing structures.
That makes waste a strong example of how fragmented purchasing can create savings opportunities.
Valify’s accelerated sourcing example shows a mid-sized IDN that found its regulated medical waste spend per staffed bed above the 75th percentile in its benchmark database. Further analysis found inconsistent pricing from the same vendor across facilities. The health system ultimately achieved 22% savings on regulated medical waste expenses.
The lesson is straightforward: before changing suppliers, understand the data behind the category.
4. Linen and Laundry Services
Linen and laundry services create recurring costs through rental, laundering, delivery, replacement, and inventory management. Lost inventory and inconsistent utilization can add to those costs over time.
Health systems can compare linen spending across facilities and departments, review replacement rates and delivery frequency, and examine whether supplier terms are consistent.
Any sourcing decision should still account for infection control, availability, turnaround times, and clinical requirements. Financial analysis works best when it is evaluated alongside operational needs.
5. Interpretation and Language Services
Interpretation services are essential for hospitals serving patients with different language needs. Services may include in-person, video, and telephone interpretation.
The savings opportunity is often less about reducing access and more about understanding how services are being used. Health systems can analyze utilization by language, location, department, and modality while reviewing rates, minimum charges, connection fees, and contract commitments.
Multiple facilities may also have different contracts for similar services. Bringing that information together can improve contract value and utilization while maintaining appropriate language access and patient safety.
6. Food and Nutrition Services
Hospital food services can include patient meals, retail dining, catering, vending, and food-service management. Costs can vary based on food purchasing, staffing models, management fees, waste, and vendor arrangements.
The American Hospital Association reported that food and nutrition service expenses per patient increased more than 15% between 2019 and 2022. The same analysis found that purchased service expenses, including areas such as IT, environmental services, facilities, and food and nutrition services, increased 18% between 2019 and 2022.
Health systems can review pricing and service models across facilities and look for opportunities to standardize specifications or sourcing where appropriate. Patient satisfaction, nutrition requirements, and service quality should remain central to the decision.
7. Facilities Management and Maintenance
Facilities management can cover building maintenance, elevator services, HVAC, grounds maintenance, security, and other support services. These categories often grow into complex portfolios of contracts across multiple facilities.
Reviewing them at the system level can uncover supplier overlap, inconsistent pricing, and opportunities to standardize terms.
Valify’s purchased services advisory case study provides a concrete example. After analyzing facility-level spend and benchmarking categories, a health system identified elevator maintenance as a significant opportunity. It implemented $1.2 million in savings on $3.1 million in annual spend and transitioned to new contracts in 90 days.
8. IT, Telecom, and Technology Services
Healthcare organizations depend on outsourced technology services, software, telecommunications, cybersecurity, infrastructure, and support. Acquisitions and decentralized purchasing can create overlapping vendors and contracts.
Reviewing licenses, utilization, renewal dates, service levels, and vendor concentration can reveal unused services, duplicate capabilities, and contracts that need renegotiation.
The right strategy may involve consolidation, right-sizing, renegotiation, or better contract terms. Technology decisions should always be evaluated alongside operational requirements, cybersecurity, and system performance.
9. Security and Other Facility Support Services
Security, parking, pest control, courier services, and similar facility support categories can represent recurring purchased-services spent across a health system.
These services are often contracted independently by facilities, which can create differences in staffing levels, coverage, rates, and contract terms.
Comparing similar agreements can show where standardized requirements or centralized sourcing may improve purchasing leverage. That does not mean every vendor should be consolidated. The right approach depends on service requirements, local conditions, performance, and risk.
10. Financial, Administrative, and Professional Services
Revenue cycle support, billing, consulting, temporary administrative services, background checks, and other outsourced business functions can be difficult to manage because pricing models and scopes vary.
Health systems should review fee structures, utilization, performance requirements, contract scope, and renewal terms. It is also important to identify services purchased independently by multiple departments or facilities and compare actual spend against contracted terms.
Valify’s purchased services model covers Financial Services and HR Services alongside other major service lines, helping organizations create broader visibility across these less-visible areas of non-labor spend.
How Health Systems Identify the Biggest Savings Opportunities
The largest category is not automatically the best category to target. Leading health systems can use a repeatable process:
- See the spend across facilities, departments, vendors, and categories.
- Clean and categorize the data so similar services can be analyzed together.
- Identify variation in pricing, utilization, suppliers, and contracts.
- Benchmark performance against relevant healthcare market data.
- Prioritize opportunities based on financial potential and operational importance.
- Take action through sourcing, renegotiation, consolidation, or contract optimization.
- Track realized savings after implementation.
This is where Valify’s positioning goes beyond a traditional reporting tool. Its technology provides purchased-services spend categorization, benchmarking, supplier insights, and contract visibility, while its advisory services help health systems move from identifying an opportunity to executing a sourcing or contracting strategy.
What Makes a Purchased Services Category Worth Targeting?
A category should not be selected solely because it has high total spend. Look for a combination of:
- High or growing spend
- Significant pricing variation
- Multiple suppliers
- Expiring or inconsistent contracts
- Off-contract or fragmented spend
- Limited benchmarking visibility
- High utilization
- Potential for sourcing or renegotiation
- Opportunities to standardize across facilities
These signals help healthcare leaders decide where deeper analysis is warranted. Valify’s research identifies limited contract visibility, vendor proliferation, auto-renewals, decentralized purchasing, and lack of benchmarking as recurring reasons hospitals overspend on purchased services.
Turning Purchased Services Data Into Annual Savings
The biggest opportunity may not be hidden in one category. It may be hidden in the volume and fragmentation of purchased-services data itself.
EVS, staffing, waste, laundry and linen, interpretation, food, facilities, IT, security, and administrative services each require a different approach. A successful strategy starts with visibility, then adds benchmarking, supplier management, contract discipline, and execution.
Valify is built specifically around that process. Its healthcare-focused platform brings purchased-services spend into view, categorizes it, provides benchmarking and supplier intelligence, and helps teams prioritize opportunities. Its advisory capabilities then support the sourcing and contracting work needed to act on those findings.
For healthcare leaders planning their cost-reduction strategy, the question is not simply, “Where can we cut?”
It is, “Which purchased-services categories have the clearest opportunity to improve value, and do we have the data to act on it?”
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the top purchased services categories creating savings opportunities for health systems in 2026?
Common opportunities include EVS, physician and clinical staffing, waste management, linen and laundry, food and nutrition, facilities maintenance, IT and telecom, security, and financial or administrative services.
How can health systems identify savings opportunities in purchased services?
Start by consolidating spend data across facilities and vendors. Then categorize the spend, identify pricing and supplier variation, review contracts, benchmark performance, and prioritize categories with meaningful savings potential.
What factors should health systems consider when prioritizing purchased services categories?
Consider spend size and growth, supplier count, pricing variation, contract status, utilization, off-contract spending, benchmarking availability, and operational importance.
How can benchmarking help hospitals improve purchased services contracts?
Benchmarking gives healthcare leaders context for evaluating current pricing. It can reveal differences between facilities or suppliers and provide stronger information for negotiations and sourcing decisions.
How can technology help health systems manage purchased services?
Technology can bring fragmented spend together, standardize categories, identify supplier and pricing patterns, provide benchmarks, improve contract visibility, and help teams track savings after a sourcing or contracting decision.
The Valify Editorial Team is dedicated to sharing insights, strategies, and innovations that help healthcare organizations gain control of purchased services spend. Backed by years of expertise in data analytics, procurement, and healthcare technology, the team curates practical resources and thought leadership to guide hospitals and health systems toward greater efficiency and savings. By combining industry knowledge with real-world case studies, the Valify Editorial Team delivers content that empowers decision-makers to drive smarter, data-driven sourcing strategies.
